Opinion

Liggins v. Bouffault

  • 434 F. App'x 237
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
May 20, 2011
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 66.1%

The opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a new trial, entering final judgment on the jury verdict, and denying his motion for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Liggins v. Clarke County School Bd., No. 5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwe, 2010 WL 4286147 (W.D.Va. Oct. 28, 2010); (Dec. 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.