Opinion

Givens v. Randolph

  • 414 F. App'x 565
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Mar 4, 2011
Status
Published
On the bench
Diaz, King, Traxler
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 66.1%

The opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dennis A. Givens appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. We have reviewed the rec *566 ord and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Givens v. Randolph, No. 5:10-cv-00026-FBS-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 12, 2010) & 2010 WL 3672222 (Sept. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral because the facts and legal are adequately presented in the before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.