Opinion

Sweet v. Hernandez

  • 107 F. App'x 775
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Filed
Aug 19, 2004
Status
Published
On the bench
Callahan, Rawlinson, Schroeder
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 10.1%

defining a prison official’s duty “to protect prisoners from violence at the hands of other prisoners”

How later courts described this case

  • defining a prison official’s duty “to protect prisoners from violence at the hands of other prisoners”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Four Salinas Valley State Prison officials, Hernandez, Monteiro, Mandeville, and Moore (“Defendants”), appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for summary judgment in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action brought by prisoner Michael Sweet. Sweet, appearing pro se, alleged that Defendants deliberately disregarded a substantial risk of serious harm by re-housing him in a facility where he had previously been injured in altercations with other prisoners. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 to consider a denial of qualified immunity. See Jeffers v. Gomez, 267 F.3d 895, 903 (9th Cir.2001). We review de novo, Billington v. Smith, 292 F.3d 1177, 1183 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

The district court properly denied Defendants’ motion for summary judgment because Sweet established a material issue of fact as to whether he had alerted the officers to the danger to his safety. See Estate of Ford v. Ramirez-Palmer, 301 F.3d 1043, 1045 (9th Cir.2002) (requiring that facts be taken in the light most favorable to the prisoner). If, as Sweet alleges, he made the prison officials aware of his fear of being attacked by the same gang members who had previously targeted him, it would be clear to a reasonable state official in the Defendants’ position that knowingly reassigning Sweet to the same prison yard where he had just been the victim of a violent attack was unlawful. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 833-34 , 114 S.Ct. 1970 , 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (defining a prison official’s duty “to protect prisoners from violence at the hands of other prisoners”).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.