Opinion

Gray ex rel. Alexander v. Bostic

  • 625 F.3d 692
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 21987
  • 2010 WL 4226522
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Filed
Oct 26, 2010
Status
Published
On the bench
Barkett, Black, Carnes, Clemon, Dubina, Edmondson, Hull, Martin, Pryor, Tjoflat, Wilson
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 77.9%

“[I]f a district court has abused its discretion, the court of appeals should not decide how to exercise the district court’s discretion; instead, it should remand the matter so that the district court can exercise its discretion free from the error of law.”

How later courts described this case

  • “[I]f a district court has abused its discretion, the court of appeals should not decide how to exercise the district court’s discretion; instead, it should remand the matter so that the district court can exercise its discretion free from the error of law.”
  • “[W]hen a district court commits an error of law in deciding how to exercise its discretion, that court has, by definition, abused its discretion”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER:

The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.