Opinion

Schiavo ex rel. Schindler v. Schiavo

  • 404 F.3d 1270
  • 2005 WL 713153
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Filed
Mar 30, 2005
Status
Published
On the bench
Anderson, Barkett, Birch, Black, Carnes, Dubina, Edmondson, Hull, Marcus, Pryor, Tjoflat, Wilson
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 57.5%

“By denying federal courts the ability to exercise abstention or inquire as to exhaustion or waiver under State law, the Act robs federal courts of judicial doctrines long-established for the conduct of prudential decisionmaking.”

How later courts described this case

  • “By denying federal courts the ability to exercise abstention or inquire as to exhaustion or waiver under State law, the Act robs federal courts of judicial doctrines long-established for the conduct of prudential decisionmaking.”
  • Birch J., specially concurring

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER:

The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Emergency Petition for Rehearing En Banc is

DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.