Opinion

M'Daniel v. Nicholson

  • 9 S.C.L. 344
Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Filed
May 15, 1818
Status
Published
Author
Grimke
On the bench
Cheves, Colcoch, Grimke, Johnson
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Grimke.

The motion, when made in the Circuit Court, was to the discretion of the presiding J udge, and I considered, that as the plaintiff knew he was not of age when he brought his action, he should not obtain, by returning into the state, a discharge of the order, by which he was bound to give security for costs, especially as he had not substituted any one to be his guardian, and who would be responsible for the same. It is true that a minor may commence an action, but he *345 cannot file his declaration, until he has some person appointed his prochain amie, or guardian; - . , .f.. . he did not do so, and went on to trial, he must be nonsuit, whatever were the merits of the In the present case of a sum. pro. he ought, at least, to have got some person appointed to act for him in that character, before the trial came on; but as he has not done so, his security must take the consequences.

I am of opinion, therefore, that the motion ought to be discharged.

Colcoch and Cheves, J. concurred.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.