Opinion

State ex rel. Poore v. Mayer

  • 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 78
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 1, 1964
Status
Published
On the bench
Gibson, Griuuith, Herbert, Kerns, Matthias, Neill, Place, Second, Stead, Taut, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

There is no question that the trial court, in the criminal proceeding, had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the person of accused. The court had the power to determine its own jurisdiction. Prohibition cannot be used to obtain an advance ruling as to the admissibility of evidence. Relator’s remedy is by way of appeal from an alleged erroneous ruling on the admissibility of the evidence.

Judgments affirmed.

Taut, C. J., Zimmerman, Kerns, 0’Neill, Griuuith and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.