The opinion
Zimmerman, J.,
dissents for the reason that in his opinion the rule of res ipsa loquitur is not properly applicable here. The fire and the accompanying loss can reasonably be ascribed to causes other than the claimed negligence of defendant, and, by invoking that rule, plaintiff is afforded an advantage to which he is not fairly entitled.
Taft and O’Neill, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.