Opinion

State ex rel. Cotleur v. Board of Education

  • 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 335
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 30, 1960
Status
Published
On the bench
Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Peck, Taft, Weygandt, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

It is conceded by the parties that the respondent board had the right to reject all bids. The “notice to bidders” provides, inter alia, that “the board of education reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive any informalities in the bidding.”

If he is right in his contentions, relator would have been “entitled to injunctive relief.

Since that would be an adequate remedy, the Court of Appeals was correct in denying relator relief by way of mandamus. State, ex rel. Grant, Jr., Exr., v. Kiefaber et al., Montgomery County Planning Comm., ante, 326.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.