Opinion

Rigg v. Correction Department

  • 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 347
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Feb 24, 1960
Status
Published
On the bench
Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Peck, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

The period from March 1950, when petitioner was declared a parole violator, to October 1955, when he was released from the Indiana State Prison, at wMch time he was restored to parole by respondent, cannot be counted as time toward the serving of Ms maximum sentence. Section 2965.21, Revised Code.

The action of the Pardon and Parole Commission in declaring petitioner to be a parole violator before the expiration of the maximum period of his sentence and before Ms final release by that commission is not reviewable in a habeas corpus *349 proceeding, even though petitioner has been returned to the penitentiary because of such action. In re Varner, 166 Ohio St., 340 .

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.