Opinion

Winters National Bank & Trust Co. v. Ross

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 335

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Jun 17, 1959
Status: Published
Author: Taet
On the bench: Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Peck, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Taet, J.,

dissents for the reason that he is of the opinion that no part of Section 1107.14, Revised Code, has been repealed by implication.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.