The opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-40513
Conference Calendar
__________________
ROBERT WAYNE MITCHELL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
FREDERICK L. BROWN, Sgt. of High Security
at Michael Unit,
HEROD NICHERSON, JR., CO III in High Security
at Michael Unit,
JIMMY E. ALFORD, Warden,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 6:94-CV-714
- - - - - - - - - -
December 20, 1995
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Robert W. Mitchell, a prisoner of the State of Texas,
appeals from the judgment of the district court dismissing his
civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Mitchell
argues that his punishment for not obeying an order to remove his
hands from his pockets violated due process because he did not
*
Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of
opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of
well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the
public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that
Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published.
No. 95-40513
-2-
have fair warning and that the officers' conduct violated the
Eighth Amendment because he suffered psychological injury. We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Mitchell's motion to amend his
complaint is DENIED.
On appeal, Mitchell can present no legal points arguable on
their merits, and the appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is
frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. We caution
Mitchell that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will
invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Mitchell
is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that
they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have
been previously decided by this court.
APPEAL DISMISSED.