Opinion

Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. Bowers

  • 166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 419
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 12, 1957
Status
Published
On the bench
Bell, From, Herbert, Matthias, Stewart, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

It is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the Board of Tax Appeals on factual issues but only to determine from an examination of the entire record whether the decision reached by the board is unreasonable or unlawful.

From an examination of the entire record, this court is unable to find that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable or unlawful. The decision is, therefore, affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

WeygaNdt, C. J., ZimmermaN, Bell and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Stewart, J., dissents from the judgment in case No. 35045 and concurs in the judgment in case No. 35046.

Taet and Herbert, JJ., dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.