Opinion

Stouffer Corp. v. Board of Liquor Control

  • 165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 96
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 21, 1956
Status
Published
Author
Weygandt
On the bench
Bell, Hart, Matthias, Stewart, Taet, Weygandt, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Weygandt, C. J.,

dissents on the ground that, although rules and regulations promulgated by the Board of Liquor Control under its statutory authority must be reasonable, the record does not disclose circumstances so changed as to render existing regulation 64 now invalid as a matter of law.

Hart, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.