Opinion
The opinion
Weygandt, C. J.,
dissents on the ground that the lower courts were correct in construing the statutory words “for schoolhouse purposes” as the statement of a necessary jurisdictional fact and not as a limitation on the authority of the board of education.
Zimmerman, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.
A word about cookies
We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.