Opinion

Burridge v. Fogg

  • 8 Mass. 183
Court
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Filed
Oct 15, 1851
Status
Published
Author
Shaw
On the bench
Shaw
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 58.2%

The opinion

Shaw, C. J.

This case we think must be governed by that of Ward v. Fuller, 15 Pick. 185 . The execution, delivery and acknowledgment of a deed, are by statute made to have the force and effect of livery of seizin, and therefore do constitute some evidence of seizin in the grantee, and therefore in the absence of all proof, on the part of the tenant, may avail. The plea of mil disseizin so far admits the tenant’s claim to have the freehold, that it is not incumbent on the demandant, to prove the tenant’s possession. Higbee v. Rice, 5 Mass. 352 ; Washington Bank v. Brown, 2 Met. 293 .

Exceptions overruled.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.