describing constructive fraud as “an elusive creature of equity characterized by an absence of intent”
How later courts described this case
- describing constructive fraud as “an elusive creature of equity characterized by an absence of intent”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Neil, C. J.,
dissents.
I dissent from the majority opinion in this case for the same reason and upon the same grounds as set forth in my dissenting opinion in Jim McCord v. Southern Railway Company this day decided, p. 271 supra.