Opinion

Long Dock Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment

  • 90 N.J.L. 701
  • 101 A. 367
  • 1917 N.J. LEXIS 409
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
May 24, 1917
Status
Published
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 73.5%

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Legal questions were first dealt with in the opinion of Mr. Justice Parker in the court below, so as to lay a foundation for the consideration of the facts, and those questions were, in our opinion, rightly decided. As there was evidence to support the finding of facts made by the Supreme Court, that finding is not reviewahle-in this court.

The judgment under review will be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Black, White, Heppbniteimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—Hone.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.