Opinion

Vassallo ex rel. Brown v. Majeski

  • 842 N.W.2d 456
  • 2014 Minn. LEXIS 60
  • 2014 WL 551682
Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Filed
Feb 12, 2014
Status
Published
Author
Stras
On the bench
Anderson, Stras, Wríght
Cited by
37 cases

holding exception to immunity for malicious acts allows liability only in cases where a public official intentionally commits an act that the official has reason to believe is prohibited

How later courts described this case

  • holding exception to immunity for malicious acts allows liability only in cases where a public official intentionally commits an act that the official has reason to believe is prohibited
  • holding that police officer’s decision to proceed through intersection at high speed with 7 squad car’s lights on but sirens off was discretionary
  • holding that police officer’s decision to proceed through intersection at high speed with squad car’s lights on but sirens off was discretionary
  • stating that the government entity’s liability “stands or falls with [the officer’s] immunity”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

STRAS, Justice

(dissenting).

I join in the dissent of Justice Anderson.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.