stating that appellate courts review the district court’s factual findings for clear error, examining the record to determine if it contains reasonable evidence to support the district court’s findings
How later courts described this case
- stating that appellate courts review the district court’s factual findings for clear error, examining the record to determine if it contains reasonable evidence to support the district court’s findings
- concluding that remand is unnecessary if the evidence supports only one result (citing Pullman-Standard, 456 U.S. at 292, 102 S.Ct. 1781)
- holding that appellate courts examine evidence in light most favorable to district court’s findings
- finding no individual liability under MHRA in unfair employment context
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
PAGE, Justice
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I join in the concurrence and dissent of Justice Paul H. Anderson.