Opinion

Brown v. White

  • 3 Blackf. 431
  • 1834 Ind. LEXIS 46
Court
Indiana Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 28, 1834
Status
Published
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 85.2%

The opinion

In an action of covenant by White against Brozan on this agreement, in which the plaintiff averred performance of his part and recovered, the following points were decided:—

*432 2. For a breach of any of Brown’s covenants in the agreement, a suit might be sustained against him by White, without an averment in the declaration that a performance had been previously requested.

■ 3. Promissory notes executed by Brown alone, were not the security for the payment of the 600 dollars, which wás required by the agreement,

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.