Opinion

Larry Williams v. Board of Education of Wicomico

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Feb 27, 2013
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2270

LARRY FRANCIS WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF WICOMICO COUNTY; JOHN FREDERICKSEN,

Ph.D., (Individually and in his Official Capacity)

Superintendent of Schools; STEPHANIE MOSES, (Individually &

in her Official Capacity) Director of Human Resources;

THOMAS FIELD, (Individually & in his Official Capacity)

Former Interim Superintendent; UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS,

Individually & in their Official Capacities; WILLIAM CAIN,

Individually & in his Official Capacity, Assistant

Superintendent,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District

Judge. (1:10-cv-03582-WMN)

Submitted: January 23, 2013 Decided: February 27, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Francis Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew G. Scott,

Leslie Robert Stellman, PESSIN KATZ LAW, P.A., Towson, Maryland;

Cullen B. Casey, Gregory Lee VanGeison, ANDERSON, COE & KING,

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Francis Williams appeals the district court’s

order awarding the Defendants summary judgment on his equal

protection claim, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006), race

discrimination claim, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006),

and defamation claim. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Williams v. Bd. of Educ. of Wicomico Cnty.,

No. 1:10-cv-03582-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 1, 2012). We deny Williams’

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.