Opinion

Cintron v. West

  • 13 Vet. App. 251
  • 1999 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 1334
  • 1999 WL 1077167
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Dec 1, 1999
Status
Published
Author
Nebeker
On the bench
Greene, Nebeker, Steinberg
Cited by
22 cases

holding, as to motion for BVA reconsideration delivered to RO, that appellant was fully advised of his appellate rights where the Secretary had provided evidence of a dated Notice that had accompanied BVA decision on appeal

How later courts described this case

  • holding, as to motion for BVA reconsideration delivered to RO, that appellant was fully advised of his appellate rights where the Secretary had provided evidence of a dated Notice that had accompanied BVA decision on appeal
  • “cause and effect” relationship must exist, i.e., appellant relied to his own detriment on action that VA took, or should have taken but did not, and equitable tolling is not invoked if “the appellant’s reliance on VA was not the cause of the late filing”
  • discussing possible application of equitable-tolling doctrine to first Rosier condition
  • as to “cause and effect” relationship

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

NEBEKER, Chief Judge,

concurring:

I concur in the result.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.