Opinion

Linville v. Principi

  • 15 Vet. App. 48
  • 2001 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 707
  • 2001 WL 660856
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Jun 13, 2001
Status
Published
On the bench
Kramer, Ivers, Steinberg
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 77.5%

The opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO . 97-66

RICHARD A. LINVILLE, APPELLANT ,

V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and IVERS and STEINBERG, Judges.

ORDER

In a February 3, 1998, opinion, the en banc Court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction the

appellant's appeal on the ground that his motion for reconsideration by the Board of Veterans'

Appeals (Board) had been filed more than 120 days after the mailing of notice of the underlying

Board decision, even though that motion had been postmarked within the 120-day Notice of Appeal

(NOA) filing period set forth in 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a). Linville v. West, 11 Vet.App. 60, 63-64 (1998)

(en banc). The appellant appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal

Circuit), and in a January 26, 1999, decision, the Federal Circuit reversed this Court's decision and

held that the postmark of the appellant's reconsideration motion within 120 days after the mailing

of that notice had tolled the running of that filing period, and that this Court had jurisdiction over

the appellant's subsequent appeal. Linville v. West, 165 F.3d 1382, 1386 (Fed. Cir. 1999). The

parties then filed with this Court a joint motion to remand the merits of the matter to the Board, and

the Court granted that motion, vacated the Board decision, and remanded the matter.

The appellant has now filed an application for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the

Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA), including attorney fees for work done

before the Federal Circuit. The Court notes that the issue of this Court's jurisdiction to award EAJA

fees for work done before the Federal Circuit has not been specifically addressed and decided. See

Barrera v. West, 13 Vet.App. 139 (1999), mot. for full Court decision denied, 13 Vet.App. 418

(2000) (en banc order and separate statements).

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that, not later than 30 days after the date of this order, the appellant file and serve

on the Secretary a supplemental memorandum addressing the Court's jurisdiction to award EAJA

fees and expenses for work done before the Federal Circuit. It is further

ORDERED that, not later than 30 days after the date of service of the appellant's

memorandum, the Secretary file and serve on the appellant a supplemental memorandum addressing

the above jurisdictional question and responding to the appellant's supplemental memorandum.

DATED: June 13, 2001 PER CURIAM.

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.