Opinion

Linville v. West

  • 11 Vet. App. 172
  • 1998 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 497
  • 1998 WL 190506
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Apr 21, 1998
Status
Published
On the bench
Farley, Greene, Holdaway, Ivers, Kramer, Nebeker, Steinberg
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.8%

noting with disapproval presentation of argument for first time in motion for reconsideration

How later courts described this case

  • noting with disapproval presentation of argument for first time in motion for reconsideration

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On March 4, 1998, counsel for the appellant filed a motion for recall of the Court’s judgment. On that same date, the Court received the appellant’s motion for reconsideration by the full Court.

Upon consideration of the foregoing and the record on appeal, and it not appearing that full Court reconsideration is necessary either to address a question of exceptional importance to the administration of laws affecting veterans’ benefits or to secure or *173 maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions, it is

ORDERED that the appellant’s motions for recall of judgment and for reconsideration by the full Court are DENIED. The motions having been denied, the Court’s entry of judgment remains undisturbed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.