Opinion

Fleshman v. Brown

  • 10 Vet. App. 50
  • 1997 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 14
  • 1997 WL 24922
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Jan 14, 1997
Status
Published
On the bench
Farley, Holdaway, Ivers, Kramer, Nebeker, Steinberg
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 6.4%

The opinion

ORDER

Note: Pursuant to U.S. Vet.App R. 28(i), this action may not be cited as precedent.

A panel of the Court affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision on appeal. See Fleshman v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 548 (1996). On December 19, 1996, the appellant filed what has been construed as a timely motion for review by the Court en banc.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, the record on appeal, and the appellant’s motion for review en bane, and it not appearing that review en bane is necessary either to address a question of exceptional importance to the administration of laws affecting veterans’ benefits or to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions, it is by the full Court

ORDERED that the judgment entered December 16, 1996, is recalled. It is further

ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for review by the Court en banc is DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.