Opinion

Tulingan v. Brown

  • 10 Vet. App. 43
  • 1997 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 91
  • 1997 WL 35191
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Jan 30, 1997
Status
Published
On the bench
Farley, Holdaway, Ivers, Kramer, Nebeker, Steinberg
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.2%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On October 24, 1996, a panel of the Court affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision on appeal. Tulingan v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 484 (1996). On December 17, 1996, the Court granted the appellant’s motion for an extension of time, until December 31, 1996, to file a motion for review en banc. On January 8, 1997, the appellant filed a motion for review by the Court en bane, out of time.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, the record on appeal, and the appellant’s motion for review en banc, and it not appearing that review en banc is necessary either to address a question of exceptional importance to the administration of laws affecting veterans’ benefits or to secure or maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions, it is

ORDERED that the motion for en banc review is accepted for filing as of the date of this order. It is further

ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for review by the Court en banc is DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.