Opinion

Dudnick v. Brown

  • 9 Vet. App. 397
  • 1996 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 739
  • 1996 WL 528208
Court
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Filed
Sep 12, 1996
Status
Published
Author
Steinberg
On the bench
Farley, Holdaway, Steinberg
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 6.4%

filing of motion for BVA reconsideration abates finality of Board decision

How later courts described this case

  • filing of motion for BVA reconsideration abates finality of Board decision

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

STEINBERG, Judge,

concurring in the result:

I agree that the appellant’s Notice of Appeal was timely filed on April 2, 1996, because the appellant’s motion for reconsideration by the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) was filed with the Secretary at the address of the Secretary’s office, 810 Vermont Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C., within 120 days after mailing of a copy of the June 1, 1995, BVA decision for which reconsideration was being sought. See Rosler v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 241, 249 (1991); 38 U.S.C. § 7266 (a). As far as the record on appeal or matters of public record indicate, as of September 29, 1995, or thereabouts, neither the BVA Chairman nor any official or employees of the BVA had offices at 810 Vermont Ave., N.W. (it appears that at that time BVA offices were located across the street at 811 Vermont Ave., N.W.). It seems to me that the Court, in accepting the motion for reconsideration as having been “filed ... at the VA”, is determining that delivery to the address of the Secretary is constructive delivery to the BVA.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.