Opinion

Austin, Nichols & Co. v. United States

  • 22 Cust. Ct. 33
  • 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1219
Court
United States Customs Court
Filed
Feb 1, 1949
Status
Published
Author
Eicwall
On the bench
Cline, Eicwall, Ekwall, Johnson
Cited by
626 cases

The opinion

*44 CONCURRING OPINION

Eicwall, Judge:

I agree with the opinion of the court that the

protest in this case should be sustained. Inasmuch as Congress has amended the law (paragraph 813 of the Tariff Act of 1930) in plain and unambiguous language to the end that customs duties imposed on beverages provided for in schedule 8 of said act shall be assessed only upon the quantities subject to internal revenue taxes, any other conclusion than that arrived at by the writer of the opinion, in which the history of the legislation is thoroughly set forth, would be contrary to the wording and intent of the law.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.