Opinion

State v. Mayor of Jersey City

  • 55 N.J.L. 511
  • 26 Vroom 511
  • 26 A. 828
  • 1893 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 55
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Jun 15, 1893
Status
Published
Author
Syckel
On the bench
Syckel
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

Section 58 of the charter of Jersey City (Pamph. L. 1871, p. 1122), which authorizes a change of grade of a street, provides for the payment of damages to landowners thereby injured, and enacts that the proceedings for such change shall correspond as nearly as may be to the proceedings for opening a street.

Section 41 of the city charter, which governs the proceedings for opening streets, provides - that damages are to be awarded to injured landowners by a board of commissioners of assessment.

Section 44 of the city charter provides that any person who shall have presented to the board of public works written objections to the award made by the commissioners, may bring; an action for the damages he sustains by the public improvement.

The defendant insists that the prosecutor lost all remedy because he did not pursue that expressly given by the city-charter.

Section 44 does not purport to take away jfrom this court the right to review the proceedings of the board of commissioners of assessments for irregularity or illegality, and such will not be presumed to be the intention of the legislature, in the absence of express language to that effect. State v. Casady. v 9 Vroom 537 .

Failure to proceed as prescribed by the forty-fourth section, deprives the landowner of the remedy by an action for damages; and in such case, if the previous proceedings have been regular, he will be compelled to submit to the award.

In this case it is admitted the board of commissioners of *514 assessment did not perform their duty to the prosecutor. They made an assessment to him for land vacant and unoccupied, whereas his land was improved and occupied. He was entitled to the benefit of the judgment of the board of commissioners, and without that there was no legal award as to him. Pie might have been content with the award of the commissioners if they had performed their duty, and need not have incurred the expense of a suit.

! The award, as to the prosecutor, should be set aside, with costs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.