Opinion

United States v. Nacoe Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jul 3, 2012
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6757

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NACOE RAY BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District

Judge. (1:01-cr-00377-JFM-1)

Submitted: June 20, 2012 Decided: July 3, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nacoe Ray Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Slaymaker Sale,

Assistant United States Attorney, Mark Walter Crooks, Stephen

Schenning, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nacoe Ray Brown appeals the district court’s order

denying his post-judgment motion requesting discovery. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v.

Brown, No. 1:01-cr-00377-JFM-1 (D. Md. Apr. 9, 2012). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.