Opinion

United States v. Sami Brown

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jun 20, 2012
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6625

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SAMI BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:08-cr-00488-REP-6)

Submitted: June 14, 2012 Decided: June 20, 2012

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sami Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Arlen Jagels, Special

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sami Brown appeals the district court’s order denying

his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence

reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Brown, No. 3:08-cr-00488-REP-6

(E.D. Va. Mar. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.