Opinion

Andrea Parris v. Baltimore County Board of Education

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jun 4, 2012
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1891

ANDREA PARRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BALTIMORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge.

(1:09-cv-00704-BEL)

Submitted: May 25, 2012 Decided: June 4, 2012

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David A. Branch, LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A. BRANCH & ASSOCIATES,

PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Leslie R. Stellman, Lisa

Y. Settles, HODES, PESSIN & KATZ, P.A., Towson, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andrea Parris appeals the district court’s order

granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in part and the

court’s final order granting Defendant’s renewed motion for

summary judgment in Parris’ civil action alleging employment

discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Parris v. Baltimore Cnty. Bd. of Educ.,

No. 1:09-cv-00704-BEL (D. Md. entered Dec. 8, 2010 & July 26,

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.