Opinion

New Madrid Banking Co. v. Brown

  • 165 Mo. 32
  • 65 S.W. 297
  • 1901 Mo. LEXIS 252
Court
Supreme Court of Missouri
Filed
Nov 19, 1901
Status
Published
Author
Valliant
On the bench
Marshall, Valliant, Views
Cited by
10 cases
Authority
More cited than 4.6%

move induced by wife’s illness and opportunity for children to attend better schools

How later courts described this case

  • move induced by wife’s illness and opportunity for children to attend better schools
  • move *281 induced by wife’s illness and opportunity for children to attend better schools

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

VALLIANT, J.

Whilst concurring in the foregoing opinion, I do not wish to be understood as holding that under the homestead law, as amended by the Act of 1895, land embraced in the homestead can be sold under execution or in course of administration to pay debts during the life of the widow or minority of the children, or even that it can be sold for such purpose at the end of the extended period of exemption. That question is not for decision in this case, because the only parties here who could complain of such a sale are-mot complaining. The heirs of Morgan have not appealed from the judgment of the circuit court, and are therefore satisfied with what the judgment gave them. In my opinion, the decisions of this court in Broyles v. Cox, 153 Mo. 242 , and In re Estate of Powell, 157 Mo. 151 , are right; and, as the rights adjudicated in those cases arose under the homestead law after the amendment of 1895, those decisions are not affected by the opinion in Keene v. Wyatt, 160 Mo. 1 .

Marshall, J., concurs in these views.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.