Opinion

State ex rel. Mitchell v. State Highway Commission

  • 163 Kan. 187
  • 182 P.2d 127
  • 1947 Kan. LEXIS 345
Court
Supreme Court of Kansas
Filed
Jun 7, 1947
Status
Published
Author
Harvey
On the bench
Harvey, Hoch, Smith, Wedell
Cited by
21 cases

The opinion

Harvey, C. J.

(limited concurrence): As I read the pleadings in this action, as they are modified by the stipulation of the parties, there is presented for our decision a relatively simple question, which may be stated as follows: When the state highway commission has rightfully condemned real property for highway purposes and later finds that a part of the real property so condemned is no *202 longer needed for highway purposes may it sell the property no longer needed and give good title to it? The affirmative answer to the question is found in our statute (G. S. 1945 Supp. 68-413).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.