Opinion

Gaines v. Reutch

  • 64 Md. 517
  • 2 A. 913
  • 1886 Md. LEXIS 118
Court
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Filed
Mar 9, 1886
Status
Published
Author
Stone
On the bench
Alvey, Bryan, Irving, Miller, Ritchie, Robinson, Stone, Yellott
Cited by
10 cases

The opinion

Stone, J.,

delivered the following dissenting opinion:

I am of opinion that the Act of 1884, does not apply to a case where administration was granted before the passage of -that Act. I therefore dissent from so much of the opinion of the Court, that decides that question. I, however, agree to the conclusion arrived at by the Court in the opinion. This conclusion would be the same whether the account was settled under the Act of 1884, or the previous law.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.