Opinion

Tavoulareas v. Tavoulareas

  • 763 F.2d 1472
  • 246 U.S. App. D.C. 211
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Jun 11, 1985
Status
Published
On the bench
Bork, Deny, Edwards, Ginsburg, MacKinnon, Mikva, Robinson, Scalia, Starr, Suggestions, Tamm, Wald, Wright
Cited by
3 cases

The opinion

ON SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

Appellees’ suggestions for rehearing en banc have been circulated to the full Court. A majority of the judges in regular active service have voted in favor thereof. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that these cases will be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that this Court’s Judgment and opinion of April 9, 1985, are vacated except to the extent they affirmed the judgment of the District Court notwithstanding the verdict in favor of appellee Sandy Golden. And, it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, on its own motion, that the opinion of the panel majority on denial of the petition for panel rehearing, issued this date, be, and the same hereby is, vacated, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the Clerk is directed to issue a partial mandate with respect to the portions of the opinion and judgment of April 9, 1985, affirming the judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of appellee Golden.

Counsel will be advised by a subsequent order of the future course of proceedings in these cases.

Circuit Judges TAMM and SCALIA would deny the suggestions for rehearing en banc.

Circuit Judge BORK did not participate in this order.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.