Opinion

Transport Workers Union v. Civil Aeronautics Board

  • 725 F.2d 775
  • 233 U.S. App. D.C. 248
  • 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2496
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 26262
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Jan 20, 1984
Status
Published
Author
MacKinnon
On the bench
MacKinnon, Tamm, Wilkey
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

MacKINNON, Senior Circuit Judge

(concurring).

In this case it should be pointed out that the CAB doubted that the prior approval of the seniority lists by the arbitrator and the CAB precluded the present claims of IBT and IAM, but the CAB made it clear that Pan Am and TWU would be “free to argue” before the arbitrator that reconsideration of the seniority lists would be unfair to them. Order 82-8-63 at 5 (JA 5). Subject to calling attention to this comment, I concur in the foregoing opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.