Opinion

Dellums v. Powell

  • 566 F.2d 231
  • 184 U.S. App. D.C. 339
  • 24 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 182
  • 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 12163
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Aug 4, 1977
Status
Published
Author
Tamm
On the bench
Leven, Tamm, Thal, Wright
Cited by
54 cases
Authority
More cited than 1.6%

holding that “Rule 60(b) applies only to modifications of final judgments”

How later courts described this case

  • holding that “Rule 60(b) applies only to modifications of final judgments”
  • finding abuse of discretion where trial court vacat *1332 ed dismissal of a plaintiff who failed to answer interrogatories
  • finding abuse of discretion where trial court vacated dismissal of a plaintiff who failed to answer interrogatories
  • “[H]owever innocent a failure to provide discovery may be, it is fundamental that a party that does not provide discovery cannot profit from its own failure_ [Parties failing to comply with discovery requests may be estopped from ‘support[ing] or oppos[ing] designated claims or defenses.’ ”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

TAMM, Circuit Judge,

dissenting:

Since I feel the judgment below was improper I must dissent. See Dellums v. Powell, 184 U.S.App.D.C. 275 , 566 F.2d 167 (August 4, 1977) (Tamm, J., dissenting).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.