Opinion

Hill v. Carter

357 Ark. 597
184 S.W.3d 431
2004 Ark. LEXIS 361

Court: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed: Jun 3, 2004
Status: Published
Author: Glaze
On the bench: Brown, Dickey, Glaze
Cited by: 5 cases
Authority: More cited than 1.5%

The opinion

Tom Glaze, Justice, concurring. I concur with the result ticby e, majority. However, to the extent the majority opinion relies on Whitley v. Cranford, 354 Ark. 253 , 119 S.W.3d 28 (2003), I strongly disagree. The Whitley decision is completely in conflict with Files v. Hill, 268 Ark. 106 , 594 S.W.2d 836 (1980), and should be overruled. In her dissenting opinion in Whitley, Justice Imber set forth the correct analysis, explaining why the Whitley decision is wrong.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.