Opinion

Pugsley v. Sellmeyer

  • 158 Ark. 247
  • 250 S.W. 538
  • 30 A.L.R. 1212
  • 1923 Ark. LEXIS 443
Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Filed
Apr 9, 1923
Status
Published
Author
Humphreys
On the bench
Hart, Humphreys, Smith
Cited by
42 cases

upholding school board regulation prohibiting use of cosmetics by pupils

How later courts described this case

  • upholding school board regulation prohibiting use of cosmetics by pupils

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Humphreys, J., (concurring). A proper showing has been made to this court that the rule complained of was rescinded after this appeal was perfected. The case is therefore moot. It is entirely unnecessary to determine whether a nonexisting rule is reasonable or unreasonable, hence I refrain from doing so.

Upon this ground alone I concur in the affirmance of the judgment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.