holding that postconviction claim *1160 that trial counsel was ineffective for not cross-examining eight-year-old victim was insufficiently pleaded where petitioner “failed to plead any facts indicating that counsel’s decision not to cross-examine the eight-year-old victim was not sound trial strategy”
How later courts described this case
- holding that postconviction claim *1160 that trial counsel was ineffective for not cross-examining eight-year-old victim was insufficiently pleaded where petitioner “failed to plead any facts indicating that counsel’s decision not to cross-examine the eight-year-old victim was not sound trial strategy”
- holding that postconviction claim that trial counsel was ineffective for not cross-examining eight-year-old victim was insufficiently pleaded where petitioner “failed to plead any facts indicating that counsel’s decision not to cross-examine the eight-year-old victim was not sound trial strategy”
- holding that ineffective-assistance claims were insufficiently pleaded when the petitioner did not plead what questions should have been asked and "how those questions" would have resulted 125 CR-2023-0206 in favorable testimony
- holding that ineffective-assistance claims were insufficiently pleaded when petitioner did not plead what questions should have been asked and "how those questions" would have resulted 130 CR-2023-0206 in favorable testimony
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
WELCH, Judge,
concurring in part and concurring in the result in part.
I respectfully concur in the result as to part I of the majority opinion. I concur as to the remainder of the opinion.