Opinion

Cox Communications v. Tommy Bowman Roofing, LLC

929 So. 2d 161
2006 La. App. LEXIS 927
2006 WL 1047128

Court: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed: Mar 15, 2006
Status: Published
Author: Tobias
On the bench: Cannizzaro, Kirby, Lombard, Murray, Reasons, Tobias
Cited by: 16 cases

The opinion

TOBIAS, J.,

dissents in part and assigns reasons.

hi respectfully dissent in part. I do not find that Cox Communication’s employment of Legier & Materne to verify whether Cox sustained any losses as a result of the 3-hour evacuation was unreasonable under the circumstances. The CPA firm’s determination was warranted lest Cox be accused by the defendants of fabricating or embellishing the calculated loss made by Mr. Elvin Thibodeaux. I would therefore award the $14,608.73 fees of Legier & Materne.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.