Opinion

Quinlan v. Jones

  • 922 So. 2d 917
  • 2005 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 492
  • 2005 WL 2046361
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Aug 26, 2005
Status
Published
Author
Crawley
On the bench
Thompson, Pittman, Bryan, Crawley, Murdock
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 1.1%

The opinion

CRAWLEY,

Presiding Judge, dissenting.

I must respectfully dissent from the af-firmance of the summary judgment in favor of Jones on Quinlan’s assault claim arising from the alleged threats on December 2, 2002; Quinlan’s assault-and-battery claim arising from the alleged events of December 30, 2002; and Quinlan’s deprivation-of-property claim. For an explanation of why I would reverse the summary judgment on those claims, please see my special writing in Quinlan v. Jones, 922 So.2d 899, 911 (Ala.Civ.App.2004) (Crawley, J., concurring in the result in part and dis *920 senting in part), rev’d, 922 So.2d 914 (Ala.2005).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.