Opinion

Bulger v. State

  • 904 So. 2d 219
  • 2004 Ala. LEXIS 209
  • 2004 WL 1909361
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Aug 27, 2004
Status
Published
Author
Woodall
On the bench
Woodall, Nabers, Houston, See, Lyons, Brown, Johnstone, Harwood, Stuart
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 51.7%

The opinion

WOODALL, Justice.

We hereby suspend the provisions of Rule 39(g) and (h), Ala. RApp. P., allowing the respondent to file a brief, and we summarily grant the writ. In an opinion released today, this Court holds that § 13A-5-9.1, Ala.Code 1975, which provides for retroactive application of an amendment to the Habitual Felony Offender Act, § 13A-5-9, Ala.Code 1975, is not unconstitutional and that an evaluation of the convicted offender by the Department of Corrections, while helpful, is not essential to the trial court’s implementation of that statute. See Kirby v. State, 899 So.2d 968 (Ala.2004). Therefore, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with Kirby .

WRIT GRANTED; REVERSED AND REMANDED.

NABERS, C.J., and HOUSTON, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, JOHNSTONE, HARWOOD, and STUART, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.