Opinion

Mathos v. School Board of Miami-Dade County

861 So. 2d 520
2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19200
2003 WL 22956441

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed: Dec 17, 2003
Status: Published
On the bench: Levy, Schwartz, Shevin
Cited by: 0 cases
Authority: More cited than 0.9%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellants had no cognizable, substantial rights in the particular positions in which they were employed by the School Board, the Board properly denied their section 120.57, Florida Statutes (2001), request for hearing challenging their reassignments to other executive positions. See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); City of Lauderhill v. Rhames, 864 So.2d 432 (Fla. 4th DCA Case no. 4D02-101, opinion filed, October 22, 2003); Muncy v. City of Dallas, 335 F.3d 394 (5th Cir.2003).

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.