addressing the issue in the context of a note with no reinstatement provision and later cited only.twice for a different proposition
How later courts described this case
- addressing the issue in the context of a note with no reinstatement provision and later cited only.twice for a different proposition
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
FITZSIMMONS, Judge,
concurring, with reasons.
I respectfully concur. The suit was filed more than five years from the acceleration. No consequential interruption of prescription occurred, other than the filing of the suit by Troy & Nichols. However, the interruption had no legal effect after the suit was voluntarily dismissed. La. C.C. art. 3468.