Opinion

Utilities Board of Daphne v. City of Fairhope

778 So. 2d 839
2000 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 587

Court: Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed: Sep 22, 2000
Status: Published
Author: Crawley
On the bench: Thompson, Robertson, Yates, Monroe, Crawley
Cited by: 0 cases
Authority: More cited than 0.8%

The opinion

CRAWLEY, Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from this court’s affirmance of the order granting a preliminary injunction. I do not believe the City of Fairhope alleged or proved either that without the injunction it would suffer an irreparable injury or that it had no adequate remedy at law. If, as the City of Fairhope argues, the Daphne Utilities Board breached the 1950 contract, then Fairhope does have an adequate remedy at law, because it can recover damages. See Martin v. City of Linden, 667 So.2d 732 (Ala.1995).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.