Opinion

Myers v. McKeithen

  • 98 La.App. 1 Cir. 2094
  • 753 So. 2d 252
  • 1998 La. App. LEXIS 2660
  • 1998 WL 665558
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Sep 18, 1998
Status
Published
Author
Weimer
On the bench
Chiasson, Kuhn, Leblanc, Parro, Weimer
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

WEIMER, J.,

concurring.

It has been said that one may have a right to do something — but is it the right thing to do? I cannot, in the context of this appeal, determine what motivated Mr. Myers to qualify for two offices. Obviously, he cannot serve in both positions. The trial court said:

Mr. Myers said a candidate should not be penalized for taking an opportunity to exploit a loophole. Were it in my power to penalize him for doing so, I would. I find this is an abuse and embarrassment of the judicial process and an abuse and an affront to the election process, but I have no discretion other than to grant the injunction which he seeks.

This court must apply the law as written. The laws governing the conduct of elections must be construed so as to promote rather than defeat candidacy and in favor of permitting the candidate to seek public office. This is proper in our democratic system of government. Ultimately, the voters should pass judgment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.