Opinion

Hills v. New Orleans City Council

  • 98 La.App. 4 Cir. 1101
  • 725 So. 2d 55
  • 1998 La. App. LEXIS 3792
  • 1999 WL 11760
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Dec 9, 1998
Status
Published
Author
Waltzer
On the bench
Jones, Plotkin, Waltzer
Cited by
16 cases

observing that “[t]he egregious nature of the offense in question is only one of several questions which should be considered by the CSC when determining whether the punishment imposed is commensurate with the offense” and that “[o]ther factors to be considered include the employee’s work record, as well as the employee’s previous disciplinary record”

How later courts described this case

  • observing that “[t]he egregious nature of the offense in question is only one of several questions which should be considered by the CSC when determining whether the punishment imposed is commensurate with the offense” and that “[o]ther factors to be considered include the employee’s work record, as well as the employee’s previous disciplinary record”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

h WALTZER, Jv

dissenting with reasons.

Because I believe that the penalty imposed on plaintiff by the Civil Service Commission was entirely appropriate to the circumstances, I respectfully dissent.

The evidence is uncontroverted that plaintiff, when asked by her supervisor to perform a task within her job description, lost control, and threw papers and office equipment, including a tray and a drawer, without regard for the safety of her co-workers. I believe that the Commission acted within its discretion in terminating plaintiffs employment.

*59 While plaintiff and her husband testified that she was taking medication at the time of the violent incident, there is no evidence as to what drug had been prescribed, by whom, or that plaintiff took the medication in accordance with the prescription. I find it significant that there is no indication from the record that plaintiff would not act in the same violent manner in the future, should her supervisor ask her to perform an unwelcome task within her job description.

The Commission’s decision to terminate plaintiff, while a severe punishment, was supported by a reasonable concern for the safety and morale of plaintiffs co-workers. While the action was severe, it was prompted by plaintiffs own severe actions. I would affirm the judgment below.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.